<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>TechExams.net IT Certification Forums - CCIE</title>
		<link>http://www.techexams.net/</link>
		<description />
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 06:37:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>30</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Great News:  CCIE Voice Migration path update</title>
			<link>http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90158-great-news-ccie-voice-migration-path-update.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:39:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[According to Cisco: 
 
"We are listening to the feedback from our valued CCIE community, and will be adjusting the CCIE Collaboration...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>According to Cisco:<br />
<br />
&quot;We are listening to the feedback from our valued <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> community, and will be adjusting the <a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/certifications/expert/ccie_collaboration/index.html" target="_blank">CCIE Collaboration</a> requirements. As a quick preview of the evolution of the <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> Collaboration certification, a current holder of the <a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/certifications/expert/ccie_voice/index.html" target="_blank">CCIE Voice</a>  designation will now be able to migrate to a <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> Collaboration  credential by taking the <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> Collaboration written exam only. We  appreciate all of the great feedback and patience of the community while  we update our webpages to reflect this change. We will be communicating  further details about this modification as soon as possible&quot;.<br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.cisco.com/web/learning/other/pop_quote.html" target="_blank">CCIE Voice Certification to CCIE Collaboration Certification update - Cisco Systems</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/">CCIE</category>
			<dc:creator>klampkin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90158-great-news-ccie-voice-migration-path-update.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Any CCIE Security warriors here?</title>
			<link>http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90059-any-ccie-security-warriors-here.html</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 16:48:23 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I want to go for my digits within a few years, but I am thinking, what about first getting my CCNP-S and then going for CCIE-S. 
 
Anyone know about...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I want to go for my digits within a few years, but I am thinking, what about first getting my <acronym title="Cisco Certified Network Professional">CCNP</acronym>-S and then going for <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym>-S.<br />
<br />
Anyone know about the demand for this cert and experience with it?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/">CCIE</category>
			<dc:creator>blueberries</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90059-any-ccie-security-warriors-here.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>What do you guys think? SDN...</title>
			<link>http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90026-what-do-you-guys-think-sdn.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I truly want to get my CCIE digits some day. Maybe within a few years. The R/S bug has bitten me. 
 
Be that as it may, I have dependents, so if I...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I truly want to get my <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> digits some day. Maybe within a few years. The R/S bug has bitten me.<br />
<br />
Be that as it may, I have dependents, so if I don't put enough meat into the shark tank, I become the meat.<br />
<br />
Is <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> worth all of the time and effort when we are on the forefront of this new technology, or am I too late to get a real nugget for my efforts?</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/">CCIE</category>
			<dc:creator>blueberries</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90026-what-do-you-guys-think-sdn.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CCIE-Wireless demand?</title>
			<link>http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90010-ccie-wireless-demand.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:11:17 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know about the demand out there for someone with a CCIE-Wireless cert? There are other wireless certs available, also, and I'm wondering...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Does anyone know about the demand out there for someone with a <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym>-Wireless cert? There are other wireless certs available, also, and I'm wondering about the desire by employers for someone with a Cisco one. It would be a b*tch if you finally completed your <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym>-Wireless written and lab only to find out that they wanted someone with a <acronym title="Certified Wireless Security Professional">CWSP</acronym> or something.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/">CCIE</category>
			<dc:creator>Cat5</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/90010-ccie-wireless-demand.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>NAT overload and STATIC NETWORK NAT on the same router...</title>
			<link>http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/89902-nat-overload-static-network-nat-same-router.html</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:04:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Hi Team, 
 
This has been driving me nuts for the last couple of hours... 
 
I basically need to do PAT (NAT overload) to my public IP address...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi Team,<br />
<br />
This has been driving me nuts for the last couple of hours...<br />
<br />
I basically need to do PAT (NAT overload) to my public IP address however in addition to this I am also running a Site-to-Site VPN (on the same link to a remote site).<br />
<br />
The issue is that when I do the &quot;ip nat inside source static network&quot; command and specify the subnets and mask I break the internet connection for the users on the LAN.<br />
<br />
I need to do the static network NAT because the remote site uses the same address range somewhere in there network.<br />
<br />
Please let me know your thoughts any and all help would be great!<br />
<br />
I have tried a few things (static 1-to-1 nat with route-maps, PBR on the LAN interface to push internet traffic to a loopback, etc...) with no luck :(<br />
<br />
I even tried this <a href="https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2172082" target="_blank">https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2172082</a> but still no joy :(<br />
<br />
Whenever the static network command is in the &quot;debug ip nat&quot; ALWAYS nat's traffic to the &quot;fake&quot; subnet. I understand this is designed this way but I need a work around to get both the VPN traffic and the Internet traffic working off the same router.<br />
<br />
I have googled extensively but can't find a working configuration out there on the world wide web, so I though I would check in with the A-Team :)<br />
<br />
Thanks in advance.<br />
<br />
Kind Regards,<br />
David</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/">CCIE</category>
			<dc:creator>davidspirovalentine</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/89902-nat-overload-static-network-nat-same-router.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CCIE Voice v3 Study Notes/CLI sheet</title>
			<link>http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/89796-ccie-voice-v3-study-notes-cli-sheet.html</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 21:08:49 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I am planning on compiling a study document listing every command (with little/no explanation) that needs to be memorized for v3 splitting it into...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I am planning on compiling a study document listing every command (with little/no explanation) that needs to be memorized for v3 splitting it into sections - all the commands needed for gateways - h323, sip, mgcp, CME, CUE, t1s, e1s, dsps, switch commands, qos, gatekeeper, and also a list of service parameters that commonly need to be changed from the default value.<br />
<br />
If someone has already done this, let me know, otherwise I will upload a doc here when I finish it</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/">CCIE</category>
			<dc:creator>rchase</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/89796-ccie-voice-v3-study-notes-cli-sheet.html</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>CCIE Collaboration Gear list</title>
			<link>http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/89699-ccie-collaboration-gear-list.html</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 22:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>CCIE Collaboration Lab Equipment and Software ListPassing  the lab exam requires a depth of understanding difficult to obtain  without hands-on...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b><acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> Collaboration Lab Equipment and Software List</b><br /><br />Passing  the lab exam requires a depth of understanding difficult to obtain  without hands-on experience. Early in your preparation you should  arrange access to equipment similar to that used on the exam, and listed  below:<br />
 <br />
<b>Lab Equipment:</b><br />
<ul><li style="">Cisco Unified Computing System (UCS) C460 Rack Server</li><li style="">Cisco 3925 Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2)</li><li style="">Cisco 2921 Integrated Services Routers Generation 2 (ISR G2)</li><li style="">ISR G2 Modules and Interface Cards<ul><li style="">- 1-Port 3rd Gen Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN Int. Cards - T1/E1</li><li style="">- Cisco High-Density Packet Voice Digital Signal Processor Modules (PVDM3)</li><li style="">- Cisco Service Ready Module 710 Service Module with Cisco Unity Express</li><li style="">- 4-port Cisco Gigabit EtherSwitch 10/100/1000BASE-TX autosensing EHWIC with POE</li></ul></li><li style="">Cisco Catalyst 3750-X Series Switch</li><li style="">Cisco Unified IP Phones 7965 and 9971</li><li style="">Cisco Jabber for Windows</li><li style="">Cisco Jabber Video for Cisco Telepresence*</li></ul>*In backbone, no candidate configuration required<br />
 <br />
<b>Software Versions</b><br />
 Any major software release which has been generally available for six  months is eligible for testing in the <acronym title="Cisco Certified Internetworking Expert">CCIE</acronym> Voice Lab Exam.<br />
<ul><li style="">Cisco Unified Communications Manager 9.1</li><li style="">Cisco Unified Communications Manager Express 9.1</li><li style="">Cisco Unified Contact Center Express 9.0</li><li style="">Cisco Unified Communications Manager IM and Presence 9.1</li><li style="">Cisco Unity Connection 9.1</li><li style="">Cisco Unity Express 8.6</li><li style="">All routers use IOS version 15.2(4) M Train</li><li style="">Cisco Catalyst 3750 Series Switches uses 15.0(2) Main Train</li></ul> <br />
<b>Network Interfaces</b><br />
<ul><li style="">Fast Ethernet</li><li style="">Frame Relay</li></ul> <br />
<b>Telephony Interfaces</b><br />
<ul><li style="">T1/E1</li></ul><br />
<br />
They are using 15.2 IOS.  Pretty much means that the 2800 series routers are worthless now.  They are still putting SAF on the lab even though that is not going to be pushed as much.  Still have PRI's.  I don't see H323 Gatekeeper in there, but they still had CUBE, so I would suspect that gatekeeper can prob make an apperance.  So far the changes are whats expected.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/">CCIE</category>
			<dc:creator>shodown</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.techexams.net/forums/ccie/89699-ccie-collaboration-gear-list.html</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
