View Single Post
kalebksp
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 940

Certifications: CCNP, CCIP, VCP, MCSE, CCNA:S, Security+
kalebksp is a jewel in the roughkalebksp is a jewel in the roughkalebksp is a jewel in the rough
Old 01-11-2009, 09:01 AM   #5 (permalink)

It seem that I was incorrect about not being able to apply extended access lists to rip's distribute list.

Here's an example of an access list I got to work:

access-list 101 deny ip any 192.168.2.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 permit ip any any

This would them block any route with a network address 192.168.2.0-192.168.2.255.

The source portion of the ACL seems to match against the neighbor routers address when applied to an inbound distribute list, I don't know if it matches anything when applied outbound.



__________________
Contradictions do not exist. Whenever you think you are facing a contradiction, check your premises. You will find that one of them is wrong.
-Ayn Rand

vCabbage

kalebksp is offline   Reply With Quote