+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: summarization

  1. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    34

    Certifications
    CCNA- CCNA-VOICE.. CCVP IN PROGRESS
    #1

    Default summarization

    I would like to summarize the following Ip . I came up w/

    172.16.8.0/21 for .8 to .15 and 172.16.16.0/22 for .16 to .19... is that correct ?

    We are using /24

    172.16.8.0
    172.16.9.0
    172.16.10.0
    172.16.11.0
    172.16.12.0
    172.16.13.0
    172.16.14.0
    172.16.15.0
    172.16.16.0
    172.16.17.0
    172.16.18.0
    172.16.19.0
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  2. SS -->
  3. Geek in Good Standing ziggi138's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Southern Indiana
    Posts
    93

    Certifications
    CCNA: Voice, CCNA, CCENT, MCTS, Net+, A+
    #2
    You could do it that way, but if it were me, i would summarize the 172.16.8.0-172.16.15.0 networks, then just have separate network statements for the remaining 4 networks.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  4. Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    34

    Certifications
    CCNA- CCNA-VOICE.. CCVP IN PROGRESS
    #3
    gotcha , as long as it is correct I am ok ..good suggestion Thank u
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  5. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    3,951
    #4
    Quote Originally Posted by ziggi138 View Post
    You could do it that way, but if it were me, i would summarize the 172.16.8.0-172.16.15.0 networks, then just have separate network statements for the remaining 4 networks.
    Do you mind if I ask why? There are occasionally good reasons to not summarize, but in most cases, why would you want to propagate 4 routes when 1 would do, especially when you're already summarizing the rest of the allocation?
    Reply With Quote Quote  

+ Reply to Thread

Social Networking & Bookmarks