+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Senior Member JohnnyBiggles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Here, Online
    Posts
    273

    Certifications
    AAS Electrical Engineering Technology, BBA Information Technology, MCP, A+, Network+, CCNA: Security, VCP5-DCV, CCNP
    #1

    Default AD vs FD with variance clarification

    Please verify:

    Path 1:

    [R1] ======= [R2] ======= [R3] ======= [R4]
    .............20...................25.............. .......20.................


    Path 2:

    [R1] ======= [R5] ======= [R6] ======= [R4]
    .............10....................10............. .......10................

    Path 3:

    [R1] ======= [R7] ======= [R8] ======= [R4]
    ...............15..................10............. .......5..................



    FD

    [1-2-3-4] = 20 + 25 + 20 = 65 {AD of 45 > FD of successor 30 = not feasible successor(?)}
    [1-5-6-4] = 10 + 10 + 10 = 30 {Lowest FD, so Best path = successor}
    [1-7-8-4] = 15 + 10 + 5 = 30 {AD of 15 < FD of successor 30 = Feasible successor(?)}

    AD
    [1-2-3-4] = 25 + 20 = 45
    [1-5-6-4] = 10 + 10 = 20
    [1-7-8-4] = 10 + 5 = 15

    So, if variance is set to 2 and the FD of the successor is 30, then 30 x 2 = 60. Therefore any FS with an FD less than or equal to 60 is a path used for load balancing?

    (So final paths with variance 2 are:
    [1-5-6-4]
    [1-7-8-4])

    Is this correct?? (I hope what I displayed makes sense)
    Last edited by JohnnyBiggles; 08-30-2013 at 07:53 PM.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  2. SS -->
  3. Network Consultant FloOz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    1,588

    Certifications
    B.S. CSIT; CompTIA A+, Network+; CCNA, DA; CCNP R&S; CCDP
    #2
    I'm a bit tired so bear with my answer. Basically the variance command will only load balance on another path as long as that paths AD is lower then the current best paths FD. So yes you are correct with this statement {AD of 15 < FD of successor 30 = Feasible successor}
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  4. Went to the dark side.... Moderator networker050184's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    11,680

    Certifications
    CCNA, CCNP, CCIP, JNCIA-JUNOS, JNCIS-SP, JNCIP-SP, MCA200
    #3
    Kind of hard to follow along without a diagram, but it seems your math is correct.
    An expert is a man who has made all the mistakes which can be made.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  5. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,321

    Certifications
    CCNP: R&S, CIW: Web Foundations; MCTS: Active Directory; MCP: 2000 Professional; CNA: NetWare 5; CompTIA A+
    #4
    Path 1 has an AD > the FD of Paths 2 and 3, so it would not be a Feasible Successor and would not be used for Load Balancing.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

+ Reply to Thread

Social Networking & Bookmarks