+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. Nidhoggr, the Net Serpent Claymoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,530

    Certifications
    MCSEx3, MCITPx6, MCTSx17
    #1

    Default Exchange 2010 Exams in Development

    From the MS Exchange Team Blog:
    You Had Me At EHLO... : Want to help shape the upcoming Exchange 2010 MCP exams?

    Looks like I will finish my 2007 MCITP just in time to upgrade.
    Reply With Quote Quote  


  2. Login/register to remove this advertisement.
  3. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    12,319
    #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Claymoore View Post
    Looks like I will finish my 2007 MCITP just in time to upgrade.
    That's how I felt about my MCSE. Oh well, at least I should be all caught up once these new ones go live.

    Thanks for the link.

    Edit: Nice comment on that article, Claymoore! I totally agree. Only two exams with no upgrade seems like a weird course of action.
    Last edited by dynamik; 05-28-2009 at 07:48 PM.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  4. Senior Member Tyrant1919's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Marysville, CA
    Posts
    516

    Certifications
    A+, Net+, Svr+, Sec+, CCNA, MCSE:S, MCITP:EA, 236
    #3
    I just ordered my 70-237/238 books too :^(. They better offer an upgrade option!
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  5. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    12,319
    #4
    Check the comments. He said they aren't since there's only going to be one TS and one Pro exam. That's when Claymoore laid the smack down
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  6. Senior Member Tyrant1919's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Marysville, CA
    Posts
    516

    Certifications
    A+, Net+, Svr+, Sec+, CCNA, MCSE:S, MCITP:EA, 236
    #5
    Their logic is flawed. There's only one TS and one Pro exam for EST. Yet they offer an upgrade exam for that.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  7. ITDufas TravR1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    332

    Certifications
    A+ Net+ Security+ Server+
    #6
    I have not even learned 2007 and they will be upgrading again. I am a slow, lazy bastard.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  8. Drops by now and again astorrs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,142

    Certifications
    I have numerous certs from VMware, Citrix, Microsoft, EMC, Nimble Storage, Palo Alto Networks and more...
    #7
    Quote Originally Posted by dynamik View Post
    Check the comments. He said they aren't since there's only going to be one TS and one Pro exam. That's when Claymoore laid the smack down
    I'll need to re-read it but I was under the impression that they were going to ask you to just pass the TS level exam since there will be relatively few changes with design & delivery in Exch2010 compared to the Exch2007 versions.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  9. Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    12,319
    #8
    Quote Originally Posted by astorrs View Post
    I'll need to re-read it but I was under the impression that they were going to ask you to just pass the TS level exam since there will be relatively few changes with design & delivery in Exch2010 compared to the Exch2007 versions.
    Quote Originally Posted by James Seymour (Microsoft Learning)
    Normally there would be an upgrade exam to cover the TS material plus the new Pro exam. But with such a short track it didn’t make sense to make an upgrade when there is only one TS exam. i.e. you take one upgrade exam or you take a TS exam – either way you’re taking one exam.
    He makes it sounds like the TS upgrade exams only "upgrade" the TS exams in the track, and you will always have to take the Pro exams in addition to the upgrade. Therefore it would be redundant to have an upgrade exam when there's only one TS exam anyway. This is how the MCITP: SA and EA are setup (although the EST and various DB MCITPs are not). It seems like they're still working out the kinks with these new certs; there's not a lot of consistency.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  10. Self-Described Huguenot blargoe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,818

    Certifications
    VCAP5-DCA; VCP3/4/5; EMCSA:CLARiiON; MCSE:M 2000/2003; MCSE:S 2000/2003; MCTS:Exch2007; Security+; A+; CCNA (expired)
    #9
    I better get on the stick then. I still have to pass the two pro exams for 2007, and I'm pretty sure my company is going to want 2010 pretty soon after it hits the shelf.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  11. Nidhoggr, the Net Serpent Claymoore's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    1,530

    Certifications
    MCSEx3, MCITPx6, MCTSx17
    #10
    Quote Originally Posted by dynamik View Post
    He makes it sounds like the TS upgrade exams only "upgrade" the TS exams in the track, and you will always have to take the Pro exams in addition to the upgrade. Therefore it would be redundant to have an upgrade exam when there's only one TS exam anyway. This is how the MCITP: SA and EA are setup (although the EST and various DB MCITPs are not). It seems like they're still working out the kinks with these new certs; there's not a lot of consistency.
    That was how I read it too, that there wasn't going to be an upgrade path because it was just one test for the MCTS or MCITP. So, as a soon-to-be MCITP:EMA, would I need to take 1 test to update my MCITP or 1 test to update my MCTS AND 1 test to update my MCITP?

    My other point was that only 2 exams for an MCITP in Exchange 2010 isn't enough, and that 4 exams were needed to cover the material in depth. Is 2010 so much less complicated than 2007 that we can eliminate an exam? I like that Database Availability Groups have replaced the SCC/LCR/CCR/SCR kluge, but as far as I can tell that is the only thing that has been simplified. Forget about those of us who already have 1 or more Exchange cert - this will be the first Exchange exam series many people take. With the improved ability to segregate administrative duties into recepient/server/organization roles, doesn't it make sense to have exams that focus on those roles? Wasn't that the whole point behind the change to the MCTS/MCITP exam configuration? Besides, would you rather study for and take 4 exams of 50 questions each or 2 exams of 100 questions each?

    BTW, every time I say DAG I want to pronounce it with the Brad Pitt Pikey accent from Snatch. I just can't help it.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  12. Senior Member Jordus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    336

    Certifications
    MCP XP | MCTS: Vista, 7, Hyper-V, AD-DS,2008 Network Infra. | MCITP:EST
    #11
    Im ok with 2 tests but not if they are 100 questions a piece.

    Ive never done much with exchange (installed 2003 once and got it worked in a very small sense of the word)

    i plan to learn it after i finish the MCITP: EA, so at that point 2010 will be the natural selection to learn. (May learn SQL first, but i doubt it)

    If its 2x100 question tests then yeah, they should break it down into 3 or so. But not if the sole purpose is to give prior certified people a windfall like 70-649 is (3 tests in one)
    Reply With Quote Quote  

  13. New Member royal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    3,373
    #12
    4 exams (3 would be better IMO) would be fine as long as there is a proper upgrade path (1/2 exam upgrade.) If I have to sit 4 exams, I would be VERY unhappy.
    Reply With Quote Quote  

+ Reply to Thread

Social Networking & Bookmarks